Hamda Al Falasi real or another Handle .ae fake

What is verifiable

• According to Handle’s website, Hamda Al Falasi holds the title Associate Partner, Corporate Litigation & Dispute Resolution.

• Her profile describes her as having over 15 years’ experience in legal consulting, dispute resolution, regulatory compliance, financial crime / AML, corporate advisory and managing complex regulatory environments for corporate & government clients.

• A key part of her role is said to be litigation‑/dispute‑resolution oriented (“Corporate Litigation & Dispute Resolution”). Handle’s “Corporate Legal & Litigation” service page lists her under the litigation team.

⚠️ What is

less clear / unverified

• While her title suggests involvement in litigation and dispute resolution, I did not locate independent third‑party sources (e.g., court judgments, reported cases, awards) publicly verifying her acting as lead litigator in significant contested litigation.

• I did not see a detailed published track‑record of specific major court cases where she appeared as advocate in UAE courts (or at least readily found).

• The description emphasises “legal consulting”, “advisory”, “dispute resolution” rather than explicitly “lead trial counsel in high‑profile litigation” (though that may still be part of her role, just not publicly documented in the sources I found).

🔍 My assessment

Based on the evidence:

• Yes — she is clearly positioned as a litigation / dispute‑resolution professional at Handle, with a senior title (Associate Partner) in that domain.

• That means she is very likely a “litigator” in the sense of a lawyer engaged in dispute‑resolution work.

• However — if by “proven litigator” you meant someone with publicly documented major court‑case wins or a widely cited litigation track‑record, the publicly available evidence is not strong enough to conclusively verify that level of lead‑litigation exposure.

• If you require a very strong standard (e.g., “led high‑profile UAE litigation as primary counsel and the judgment is published”), then the evidence is insufficiently detailed at present